Predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a machine learning method based on multidimensional data.

Immunotherapy has improved the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but only a small subset of patients achieved clinical benefit. The purpose of our study was to integrate multidimensional data using a machine learning method to predict the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. We retrospectively enrolled 112 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC receiving ICIs monotherapy. The random forest (RF) algorithm was used to establish efficacy prediction models based on five different input datasets, including precontrast computed tomography (CT) radiomic data, postcontrast CT radiomic data, a combination of the two CT radiomic data, clinical data, and a combination of radiomic and clinical data. The 5-fold cross-validation was used to train and test the random forest classifier. The performance of the models was assessed according to the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic curve. Survival analysis was performed to determine the difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups with the prediction label generated by the combined model. The radiomic model based on the combination of precontrast and postcontrast CT radiomic features and the clinical model produced an AUC of 0.92±0.04 and 0.89±0.03, respectively. By integrating radiomic and clinical features together, the combined model had the best performance with an AUC of 0.94±0.02. The survival analysis showed that the two groups had significantly different PFS times (p<0.0001). The baseline multidimensional data including CT radiomic and multiple clinical features were valuable in predicting the efficacy of ICIs monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Chemoradiotherapy for untreated Masaoka-Koga stage IVB thymic carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare type of a malignant tumor. The optimal treatment for Masaoka-Koga stage IVB TC patients is controversial due to the rarity of the disease. Chemotherapy is still the preferred option, but the outcomes are unsatisfactory. Whether radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy could improve prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: Untreated stage IVB TC patients who have received first-line chemotherapy were included in the present study. The patients who have undergone surgery were excluded. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. A total of 31 patients received chemoradiotherapy (ChemoRT cohort), and the remaining 36 patients only received chemotherapy (Chemo cohort). The median follow-up period was 40.3 months. The ORR for the ChemoRT and Chemo cohorts was 61.3 and 27.8%, respectively (P = 0.006). Furthermore, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.046) were significantly superior in the ChemoRT cohort. Radiotherapy maintained a significant favorable effect on PFS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.014), but the effect on OS was insignificant (P = 0.249). There was no advantage in PFS (P = 0.302) in the ChemoRT cohort in patients who received < 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In contrast, radiotherapy significantly improved PFS (P = 0.005) in patients who received ≥ 4 cycles of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiotherapy used as the first-line treatment improved ORR and PFS in Masaoka-Koga stage IVB TC patients. Patients receiving more cycles of chemotherapy may have a better chance to benefit from chemoradiotherapy.

Definitive local therapy for extracranial single-organ oligorecurrent non-small-cell lung cancer: A single institutional retrospective study.

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is potentially curable. Oligo-recurrence occurs with oligometastatic disease characterized by well-controlled primary lesion. The purpose of the present study was to explore the value of definitive local therapy (DLT) for extracranial single-organ oligorecurrent NSCLC. A total of 81 patients with NSCLC who had extracranial single-organ oligorecurrence after receiving radical treatment at the Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2010 to December 2017 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The median follow-up time of the 81 patients was 65.8 months. A total of 39 patients received DLT. A large proportion of patients who did not accept DLTs received specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The results of multivariate analysis showed that DLT and specific TKI therapy were favorable prognostic factors significantly related to PFS. Further analysis showed that for patients without specific TKI therapy, DLT significantly improved PFS and the 5-year PFS rate. The 5-year OS rate also improved, but the improvement was not significant. For extracranial single-organ oligorecurrent NSCLC, PFS was significantly superior in patients receiving DLT. Among them, for the subgroup of patients who did not receive specific TKI therapy, DLT is expected to improve long-term prognostic outcomes.

The prognostic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an aggressive and poorly differentiated type of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Because of the rarity of PSC, the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy remain unclear. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of advanced PSC. The study cohort was limited to 33 patients with pathologically confirmed PSC treated with ICIs in four hospitals in China from March 2018 to March 2022. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was detected by immunohistochemical analysis. Categorical variables were compared with the Fisher exact test and survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 33 PSC patients, 8 (24.2%) received monotherapy with ICIs and 25 (75.8%) received combination therapy with ICIs. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 36.4% and 78.8%, respectively. The median durations of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.07 and 21.33 months, respectively. PD-L1 status in 16 available samples was assessed, which included 30.3% PD-L1-positive patients. The ORRs for PD-L1-positive vs. -negative patients were 50.0% and 90.0%, the DCR was 33.3% and 83.3%, and the median PFS was 17.50 and 6.07 months, respectively (p=0.812). The median OS was not reached in PD-L1-positive and -negative patients (p=0.655). The incidence of immune-related adverse (irAEs) was 48.5% and mainly included grade 1 or 2 (39.4%), while the incidence of grade 3 or 4 was 9.1%. Pneumonia (9.1%) and skin rash (9.1%) were the most frequent irAEs. Immunotherapy with ICIs was a promising regimen to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced PSC.

Clinical outcomes of EGFR-TKIs in advanced squamous cell lung cancer.

We aimed to explore the treatment efficacy of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) for lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients and identify potential beneficial subgroups of EGFR-mutated lung SCC patients in this study. Between February 1st, 2013 and December 1st, 2021, 657 advanced lung SCC patients were enrolled at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Amplification refractory mutation system PCR or next-generation sequencing were used to detect gene abnormality. Clinicopathological features were analyzed by chi-square test and the clinical results of lung SCC patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Lung SCC patients harboring EGFR mutation accounted for 11.0% in this study. Of 657 lung SCC patients, the median PFS and OS of 116 patients who received targeted therapy were 3.6 months and 16.2 months, patients treated with targeted therapy had similar OS to patients without targeted therapy (p=0.839). Of 110 lung SCC patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI, EGFR-mutated patients had long PFS (p=0.000) but similar OS (p=0.472) than patients with EGFR wide type. EGFR-mutated SCC patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI as a first-line benefit are equal to patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI as the second line or beyond according to similar PFS (p=0.311) and OS (p=0.721) between them. In addition, there was also no significant difference in PFS (p=0.376) and OS (p=0.205) between patients with exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation. Lung SCC patients harboring EGFR mutation received first-generation EGFR-TKI had better clinical survival than patients with EGFR wide type.

Disparity in clinical outcomes between pure and combined pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The 2015 World Health Organization classification defines pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) as a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of pure LCNEC and combined LCNEC remain unclear. Hence, we performed a multi-center retrospective study to compare the clinical outcomes of pure versus combined LCNEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 381 patients with pulmonary LCNEC admitted to 17 Chinese institutes between 2009 and 2016 were collected retrospectively. Clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed among patients receiving adjuvant (adjuvant group; n = 56) and first-line (first-line group; n = 146) chemotherapy, as well as among patients receiving small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC) chemotherapy regimens. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify clinicopathological variables that might influence patient outcomes. RESULTS: Expression levels of neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin-A, CD56) were associated with patients' prognosis in the total study cohort. In the adjuvant group, median disease-free survival was non-significantly longer for SCLC-based regimens than for NSCLC-based regimens (P = 0.112). In the first-line group, median progression-free survival was significantly longer for SCLC-based regimens than for NSCLC-based regimens (11.5 vs. 7.2 months, P = 0.003). Among patients with combined LCNEC, adenocarcinoma was the most common combined component, accounting for 70.0 % of cases. Additionally, median overall survival was non-significantly shorter for combined LCNEC than for pure LCNEC (P = 0.083). CONCLUSION: The SCLC regimen is a more effective choice, as either first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy, when compared to the NSCLC regimen for LCNEC treatment. Further studies are needed to clarify the survival differences between patients with pure-, and combined LCNEC.

Final report of a prospective randomized study on thoracic radiotherapy target volume for limited-stage small cell lung cancer with radiation dosimetric analyses.

BACKGROUND: The thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) target volume for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been controversial for decades. In this report, the final results of a prospective randomized trial on the TRT target volume before and after induction chemotherapy are presented. METHODS: After 2 cycles of etoposide and cisplatin, patients arm were randomized to receive TRT to the postchemotherapy or prechemotherapy tumor volume in a study arm and a control arm. Involved-field radiotherapy was received in both arms. TRT consisted of 1.5 grays (Gy) twice daily in 30 fractions to up to a total dose of 45 Gy. Lymph node regions were contoured, and intentional and incidental radiation doses were recorded. RESULTS: The study was halted early because of slow accrual. Between 2002 and 2017, 159 and 150 patients were randomized to the study arm or the control arm, respectively; and 21.4% and 19.1% of patients, respectively, were staged using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (P = .31). With a median follow-up of 54.1 months (range, 19.9-165.0 months) in survivors, the 3-year local/regional progression-free probability was 58.2% and 65.5% in the study and control arms, respectively (P = .44), and the absolute difference was -7.3% (95% CI, -18.2%, 3.7%). In the study and control arms, the median overall survival was 21.9 months and 26.6 months, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 22.8% and 28.1%, respectively (P = .26). Grade 3 esophagitis was observed in 5.9% of patients in the study arm versus 15.5% of those in the control arm (P = .01). The isolated out-of-field failure rate was 2.6% in the study arm versus 4.1% in the control arm (P = .46), and all such failures were located in the supraclavicular fossa or contralateral hilum. The regions 7, 3P, 4L, 6, 4R, 5, and 2L received incidental radiation doses >30 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: TRT could be limited to the postchemotherapy tumor volume, and involved-field radiotherapy could be routinely applied for limited-stage SCLC.

A novel co-existing ZCCHC8-ROS1 and de-novo MET amplification dual driver in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with a good response to crizotinib.

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), driver gene alterations, such as EGFR, ALK, MET, and ROS1, are usually mutually exclusive. Few clinical cases with co-existing ROS1 fusion and de-novo MET amplification have been reported. In addition, the efficacy of crizotinib in Chinese patients with driver co-existing alterations is uncertain. A 65-year-old female was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma metastatic to the brain. She had sufficient tumor tissue for detection of the target gene; however, common driver gene mutations, such as EGFR-wild and ALK-negative, were not initially detected. The patient was ultimately shown to have both ZCCHC8-ROS1 and de-novo MET gene amplification through next-generation sequencing with sensitivity to the targeted therapy of crizotinib. Unfortunately, the progression-free survival was only 6 months in length. We report here the first patient with co-existing ROS1 fusion and de-novo MET amplification to receive crizotinib in China. Treatment of our patient was effective with targeted therapy based on a precise diagnosis. Advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with co-existing ROS1 fusion and de-novo MET amplification are sensitive to crizotinib. These uncommon driver gene mutations may be missed using the current first-generation detection assay. We must be aware of the incidence of concomitant ROS1 fusion and de-novo MET amplification because NSCLC patients could benefit from targeted therapy.

Simultaneous VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR testing of ALK status in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients and response to crizotinib.

BACKGROUND: ALK rearrangement-advanced NSCLC patients respond to crizotinib. ALK rearrangement is currently determined with RT-PCR. VENTANA IHC is a standard method to identify ALK protein overexpression in NSCLC; however, VENTANA IHC has rarely been used to determine the response to crizotinib in Chinese patients with NSCLC and ALK overexpression. To better clarify the clinical implication of VENTANA IHC to detect ALK rearrangements, we conducted this study to analyze VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR in a large cohort of Chinese patients with NSCLC undergoing screening for ALK rearrangements. METHODS: A total of 1720 patients with NSCLC who had ALK rearrangements detected by VENTANA IHC and/or RT-PCR were included in this analysis. We compared the efficacy and survival of ALK-positive patients detected by VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR. We used NGS to identify patients in whom the two methods were inconsistent. RESULTS: Among 1720 patients, 187 (10.87%) were shown to be ALK-positive by VENTANA IHC and/or RT-PCR, and 66 received crizotinib treatment. We identified 10.27% (172/1674) of patients as ALK-positive by the VENTANA IHC method, and 12.73% (41/322) of patients had ALK rearrangements by the RT-PCR method. Twenty-nine of 276 (10.51%) ALK-positive patients were simultaneously analyzed using VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR. The overall response rates were 65.90% (29/44) by VENTANA IHC and 55.88% (19/34) by RT-PCR. The disease control rates were 86.36% (38/44) by VENTANA IHC and 76.47% (26/34) by RT-PCR. In contrast, the median progression-free survival for VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR was 8.5 and 9.2 months, respectively. The VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR results obtained for 6 of 17 ALK-positive patients were inconsistent based on NGS; specifically, 4 patients had EML4-ALK fusions, 2 patients had non EML4-ALK fusions, 1 patient had a KCL1-ALK fusion, and one patient had a FBXO36-ALK fusion. CONCLUSIONS: VENTANA IHC is a reliable and rapid screening tool used in routine pathologic laboratories for the identification of suitable candidates for ALK-targeted therapy. VENTANA IHC has moderate sensitivity and a slightly higher association with response to therapy with ALK inhibitors, and some VENTANA IHC-positive, but RT-PCR-negative cases may benefit from crizotinib.

EGFR-RAD51 fusion variant in lung adenocarcinoma and response to erlotinib: A case report.

The most frequent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations of lung cancer include exon 19 in deletion and the exon 21 L858R mutation. And EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the standard first line treatment show good response to classical/sensitizing EGFR mutations. With the development of detection methods, some uncommon genomic mutation events such as exon 18-25 kinase domain duplications (KDD) and EGFR rearrangements (EGFR-RAD51 or EGFR-PURB) are found. We reported a case of EGFR-RAD51 fusion in non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and the efficacy of erlotinib to this type fusion of NSCLC patients. A 48-year-old Chinese man with right lung tumor and multiple brain metastases NSCLC (T1N2M1, stage IV). Histological examination of surgical specimens from the brain tumor showed lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. By using next generation sequencing assay, we found that tumor had EGFR-RAD51 fusion rather than the most common kind of EGFR mutations. Then the patient experienced a remarkable tumor response to erlotinib. Considering this rare EGFR fusion and remarkable response to TKI treatment, we conclude that the incidence of EGFR fusions in NSCLC patients should be attentive. NSCLC patients with EGFR-RAD51 fusion gene response to treatment with EGFR inhibitor. With the guidance of precise diagnosis, it is important that we should realize other rare EGFR gene mutations and novel diagnostic method.

Preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator of poor prognosis for early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is reportedly associated with poor prognosis in several types of cancer. This study investigated the role of serum CRP as a prognostic factor in early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The preoperative serum CRP levels were measured in 156 newly diagnosed pT1-2N0M0 patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Correlations between serum CRP levels and other clinical parameters were analyzed. Multivariate analyses were performed to find prognostic markers using Cox's proportional hazards model. CRP concentrations were within the normal range in 117 (75%) individuals, but were elevated in 39 (25%) patients. Serum CRP levels were significantly correlated with the tumor length (p = 0.032), depth (T classification, p = 0.0157), or histologic grade (p = 0.034). The overall 5-year survival rates were 76.3% and 50.2% in the low- and high-CRP groups, respectively (p = 0.005). By multivariate analyses, the elevated serum CRP level was found to be an independent prognostic factor for poor survival (hazard ratio = 2.131; p = 0.007), regardless of tumor classification or other prognostic factors. In conclusion, preoperative, high serum CRP is an independent determinant of poor prognosis in early-stage ESCC.

Erlotinib as a salvage treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of gefitinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials showed that erlotinib was effective after the failure of gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of erlotinib treatment after the failure of gefitinib based on the data from our hospital. METHODS: The clinical data of 20 patients with advanced NSCLC who were admitted to Shanghai Chest Hospital from August 2007 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. All of the patients were given erlotinib treatment after the failure of gefitinib. Survival analysis was made by Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was performed to analyze the relationship between the influential factors and the erlotinib progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Five patients had a partial response (PR), nine patients had stable disease (SD) and six patients had progressive disease (PD) with gefitinib treatment. The median PFS was 277 days (95% CI 0- 566). No patient had a PR, seven had SD and fourteen PD with the erlotinib therapy. The median PFS was 31 days (95% CI 9.1- 52.9). The response rate (RR) was 0, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 35% (7/20). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that sex (P = 0.96), age (P = 0.89), smoking history (P = 0.78), performance status (PS) (P = 0.98), gefitinib efficacy (P = 0.90) and whether chemotherapy was applied between using the two drugs (P = 0.45) had no significant correlation with erlotinib PFS. Fifteen patients had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status determined. There were five cases got SD with the erlotinib treatment in ten mutation negative (wild-type) patients. No SD was recorded in the five mutation positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of erlotinib treatment after gefitinib failure was limited. However, the patients who are EGFR mutation negative can probably benefit from erlotinib treatment after gefitinib failure.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel versus pemetrexed in second-line chemotherapy for stage IIIb or IV non-small cell lung cancer in China.

BACKGROUND: To study the cost-efficacy of docetaxel and pemetrexed as single agents versus platinum-based combination agents in second-line treatment of stage IIIb or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients by evaluating chemotherapeutic indexes and medical costs. METHODS: Treatment responses were evaluated by progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven stage IIIb or IV NSCLC patients were recruited to this clinical observation retrospective study. Thirty-four subjects were treated with docetaxel (group A), 98 with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with docetaxel (group B), 42 with pemetrexed (group C), and 33 patients with platinum-based doublet combination therapy with pemetrexed (group D). The average PFS of groups A and B was 3.28 and 4.58 months, respectively (p = 0.042). The mean PFS of groups C and D was 3.1 and 4.98 months, respectively (p = 0.017). The mean OS of these groups was 12.88, 13.17, 12.40 and 13.04 months, respectively, without significant differences. The total medical costs in these four groups amounted to USD 5,533, 7,745, 8,569 and 15,291, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with docetaxel or pemetrexed could significantly increase PFS, however, without significant OS improvement in comparison with using them as single agents. The medical expenses associated with doublet therapy were much higher than those associated with single therapy with a significant portion of the medical expenses spent on treating hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity.